By Nicole Montesano • Staff Writer • 

Commissioners remove elected officials from new harassment policy

Yamhill County Commissioners on Thursday approved a new policy to prohibit harassment, bullying and discrimination by any county employee, volunteer, intern or contractor. It does not prohibit such behavior by elected officials.

The new policy, required by the Oregon Workplace Fairness Act, replaces a previous one that specifically banned only sexual harassment and discrimination against protected classes.

The policy presented to the commissioners stated that “elected officials, department heads, managers and supervisors are responsible for creating an atmosphere free of discrimination, harassment and sexual assault” and stated that anyone associated with the county must “refrain from engaging in conduct prohibited by this policy.”

However, at the request of Commission Chair Lindsay Berschauer, the board removed elected officials from the policy.

“I think it’s problematic if you start putting people in there that the policy really doesn’t apply to, and instead, start putting something together that would apply to commissioners,” Berschauer said, noting that the county would in any case have no ability to discipline a commissioner who violated the policy.

Berschauer suggested that, instead, the board create a “code of conduct.” She and Commissioner Mary Starrett spent several minutes discussing the importance of transparency regarding officials’ use of travel reimbursement funds.

In 2021, an employee filed a hostile workplace complaint against Berschauer that was found unsubstantiated in part because the county lacked any policy barring commissioners from harassing employees, and in part because the county’s policy for employees at that time specified only sexual harassment.

On Thursday, Berschauer and Starrett noted that the board could, if it wished, vote to censure a commissioner. No such vote was ever held in the earlier case against Berschauer, who, with Starrett, held a voting majority at the time.

“A lot of times these things just become something that sits on the shelf,” Starrett said, adding “If we have to get to a point where we’re outlining how to do things right ... Maybe I just haven’t seen an example of one.”

The 2021 complaint followed months of verbal attacks on staff by Berschauer during discussions of the Yamhelas Westsider Trail. Berschauer’s election campaign was heavily financed by trail opponents, and she made ending the project one of her first priorities once elected.

During public meetings, Berschauer repeatedly accused staff members of malfeasance, incompetence and dishonesty, in many cases for actions that had been approved by the previous board. The employee noted in the complaint that there had been “numerous verbal and written communications between the county administrator and Ms. Berschauer concerning Yamhill County policies and procedures for complaints involving staff,” but that Berschauer had ignored them, instead airing her allegations publicly, and repeating them even after being publicly corrected about factual errors.

Attorney Christine Slattery investigated the complaint for the county.

In an executive summary of her findings, she noted that Berschauer denied her actions had been inappropriate.

Slattery wrote that the allegations “do not easily fit into the County’s existing policies and ordinances. As an initial matter, Commissioner Berschauer is an elected official, and there are no existing County ordinances applicable to allegations against a sitting Commissioner regarding harassing, bullying, defamatory, libelous, and/or abusive behavior towards staff.”

Further, she wrote, the conduct wasn’t related to discrimination against any protected class, and there was no allegation that her behavior was sexual in nature. Given those limitations, Slattery wrote, the complaint could not be substantiated.

“These findings should not be read to suggest that Commissioner Berschauer’s conduct ... is beyond reproach,” Slattery wrote.

The employee also alleged that Berschauer had tried to have her fired, but Slattery said she was unable to confirm that.

Commissioners on Thursday did not discuss how harassment of employees by an elected official might be handled.

Comments

Oregonian

County employees can't harass commissioners, but commissioners CAN harass employees. Yamhill County keeps sliding away from normalcy.

Jean

An estimated 26% of eligible voters voted for them. We get...and we deserve...what we don't vote for.

Bryant

How in God's name is she still a commissioner?

BigfootLives

She won an election because a majority of Yamhill county residents did not want the wine country trail to hell. Progressive Yamhill failed to follow proper procedure on the first recall effort and did not turn in correct signature sheets according to then clerk Vanbergen, then on Progressive Yamhill's second successful attempt to get a recall on the ballot, the people of the county turned them down.

Slattery wrote that the allegations “do not easily fit into the County’s existing policies and ordinances. As an initial matter, Commissioner Berschauer is an elected official, and there are no existing County ordinances applicable to allegations against a sitting Commissioner regarding harassing, bullying, defamatory, libelous, and/or abusive behavior towards staff.”

Translation: she did not do any of that.

“These findings should not be read to suggest that Commissioner Berschauer’s conduct ... is beyond reproach,” Slattery wrote.

The employee also alleged that Berschauer had tried to have her fired, but Slattery said she was unable to confirm that.

Translation: Just because she's not guilty doesn't mean she's not guilty.

Maybe she can open a six year investigation into the commissioner looking for a crime, any crime. You know, like they are doing with President Trump.

Oregonian

Yamhill County needs to contact some of the media companies and start a new realty TV show. This would be entertainment gold. You can't make up this sort of behavior from these sort of weirdo characters.

madmacs

Queen Mary and Princess Lindsey once again tell all us plebes they will do what they want and we T.S. for the rest of us if we don't like it. Besides, they won't be paying the legal fees and settlements for their misconduct suits, we sill.

YamCoCan

Bigfoot - she did call staff names, she attacked their character, and threaten their livelihoods. She did it in public meetings and she bragged about it on social media. Saying she didn’t do those things is just silly when you can still go watch the meetings or speak with staff about how they are often (still) made to feel unsafe in their work.

The investigation didn’t find that she didn’t treat staff horribly. It found that YC didn’t have rules against it. Now the state says there HAVE to be rules against workplace harassment outside of sexual conduct and the first thing she does is opt herself and her colleagues from such rules.

This following a political appointment that wasn’t advertised and attending events only if hosted by supporters. If you’re still waiting for a clearer picture of corruption, I’m not sure it can be drawn for you.

Erin C.

@BigFootLives. The organization that ran the Recall Effort against Commissioner Berschauer was Save Yamhill County. Progressive Yamhill is an online message board and discussion forum where progressives can discuss local issues. There is some overlap in membership but they are different entities. Sort of like how if a church posted items on a local buy nothing Facebook Group, you wouldn't then say that the buy nothing group was offering service on Sunday.

The confusion is understandable, as Berschauer herself actively conflated the two groups for her political benefit.

atlas

Every time I think the corruption at Yamhill County can't get any deeper, it does. In one way, shape, or form this stuff has been going on for years by the Commissioners and Administration. They are just getting more bold since they have pretty much gotten away with it on several occasions. I am encouraged by the recent lawsuit filed in federal court against the county. Since they have violated the constitution (4th and 14th amendments) on several previous occasions, maybe now this can get the federal court attention that it deserves. So sad for our citizens. Way more money wasting and time wasting than most people realize.

Web Design and Web Development by Buildable