© 1999- News-Register Publishing | © The Associated Press
The News-Register and NewsRegister.com are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
The News-Register and NewsRegister.com are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Comments
miketubbs1
"It's Wyden who will end up on the right side of history here."
Or not.
Horse with no name
Excellent article. It's nice to read an articulate article about a vital issue. Dick Cheney and the other nut jobs need to take a break, they are part of the problem. Pissing matches are for chicken hawks.
miketubbs1
"It's nice to read an articulate article about a vital issue."
-Horse with no name
Articulate article, eh? First off, this is definitely not an 'arms treaty'. A treaty requires a super majority, not 41. This is only an 'agreement'.
If Wyden actually believes he'd voted to block congressional rejection of a treaty, which he has clearly not, then, words have no meaning.
There is no doubt in my mind that Obama, Kerry and Wyden will end up on the wrong side of history here. Just my humble opinion, not that my opinion matters.