By Nicole Montesano • Staff Writer • 

Yamhill woman loses to county's forfeiture claim

Only online subscribers may access this article.

One-day subscriptions available for just $2. Click here for one-day access.

For all other subscription offers, click here.

Already a subscriber, please .


Christmas has Talons

Normally I am not a fan of foreclosure but in this case I am thrilled.


Thank God,the poison this POS put out there was incredible.

David S. Wall

"Ray said that forfeiture proceeds are distributed as follows: 47.5% to law enforcement agencies; 20% to the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission;10% each to the state Department of Education and scholarships to children of public safety officers who died or were disabled in the line of duty; 5% to the Department of Environmental Quality, and 2.5% to the Asset Forfeiture Oversight Advisory Committee."

The "forfeiture proceeds" as discussed in the article totaled "95%." Where does the remaining "5%" go?

"He also argued that the state moved to seize the property after the deadline expired. However, a judge denied the motion." Did the judge commit a "reversible error?" Deadlines are "Deadlines."

"Sheriff’s Capt. Chris Ray, no relation, said it is rare for the county to pursue forfeiture of real property."

Maybe this is true for drug-related cases but, Commissioner Starrett's unquenchable thirst for tax-foreclosed properties being seized by the County and then turned over to "Non-profit and or Public Benefit Corporations" for "Drug-Criminal element jail diversion-Rehab" is legendary.

The irony of this case is Ms. Sublet might end-up in a County "Rehab-house" located in our neighborhoods; where "Peer Counseling" paid for by Taxpayers, will "rehabilitate" her.

Great job Law Enforcement!

...More money should be afforded to the "widows and orphans fund" of fallen public safety officers. And these monies should be "tax-free" if they are not already.

David S. Wall


When will the airplane arrive?


On March 30, 2018 the News Register posted a story on Sublet titled "Rural Yamhill Drug Dealer Indicted". In that story the News Register wrote;

"According to the probable cause affidavit:

On two occasions last October, the Yamhill County Interagency Narcotics Team used a confidential informant to purchase about one-quarter pound of meth from Sublet. The buys took place at her Northwest Pike Road residence, west of Yamhill.

Then, in late October, a search warrant was served on the home and a FedEx package delivered to the residence.

The package contained more than five pounds of meth and about one-half pound of heroin. Sublet admitted the package was hers and she intended to sell the drugs to about 10 customers. A handgun belonging to Sublet was also seized."

Has the News Register asked if YCINT knows how many packages Sublet may have received at her home before she was investigated and arrested?

Web Design and Web Development by Buildable