© 1999- News-Register Publishing | © The Associated Press
The News-Register and NewsRegister.com are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
The News-Register and NewsRegister.com are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Comments
Bigfootlives
That money is gone. FUBAR. Fackler likey spent the money to pay employee salaries or to finish other projects. Any likely hood of going after the contractor bond that contractor’s need to stay in business is probably too late. Those bonds are first come first served and go fast when a business defaults and if the city is not already in line it’s probably too late.
One more ho hum other people money? Any consequences? The cities attitude towards subcontractors should be a warning shot for subs before doing business with the city.
Remember this when Remy Drabkin runs for Mary Starrett’s commissioner seat.
leo
A clerical error was not Remy Drabkin's fault. So get over your rant bigfoot.
fiddler
Did the city contact any subs to ask if they were paid, or is it an assumption that Fackler deposited the check and didn't pay them?
If the subs were not paid, why wouldn't the citypay the subs and then recover from Fackler? The subs may have families to feed, rent to pay, etc., and paying them may help down the road when the city needs subs or contractors with the same subs. Why hold the subs hostage? Or maybe we don't need to worry about them because Fackler paid them--the article doesn't state what effort was made to contact the subs.
fiddler
What's going on with the "hundreds" of lawsuits against Lindsay?
tagup
If the money is being held in escrow, then the subs likely haven’t been paid.
They way I understand this article was the checks were to pay the subs, that’s why they should have been two-party checks…..you think the city should pay the subs again?
The entire “clerical error” excuse is a cop out….management dropped the ball & didn’t follow through to make sure the deal was completed correctly.
Who is (was) the city’s project manager for this? Anyone? Extremely poor oversight for taxpayers money.