By Scott Unger • Of the News-Register • 

Starrett takes aim at gun measures

Only current online subscribers may access this article and/or our N-R e-editions.

One-day subscriptions available for just $3.

For all subscription offers, click here.

Already a subscriber, please

Comments

fiddler

Starrett: so, you will not accept any control on fire arms, but you’re first in line to legislate a woman’s body?

Is your campaign money from NRA? We need some controls because of this school shootings and suicides.

Please resign.
.

Easy Writer

What is your fascination with guns, Mary? It's so offensive. Fiddler's right. Please resign.

Bigfootlives

What is the obsession with murdering innocent babies in the satanic ritual of abortion? And you think wanting to protect our second amendment is offensive? Maybe you should go buy a permit, take a class, pass a test and ask permission before you post THOSE opinions to the NR. 1st amendment, or 2nd amendment, what’s the difference.

Moe

The Second Amendment underpins all of the others.

So important is the Second Amendment that it is covered in detail in the Constitution itself: Article I, Section 8.

Tyler C

The idea that the 2nd Amendment allows for unlimited possession of any gun by any person in the US is a relatively new idea. It started when the NRA switched over from a gun safety and sporting club to a lobbyist group for the gun manufacturing industry in the 70s and 80s.

I support citizens owning guns and practicing reasonable gun safety. But people who base their entire personality on owning guns will eventually have to contend with the spiritual and moral decay that comes from constantly planning to take another human's life.

  • Most viewed
  • Most commented
Web Design and Web Development by Buildable