By Jeb Bladine • President / Publisher • 

Jeb Bladine: Government mixes weaknesses with strengths

Government isn’t bad, we keep reminding ourselves. It protects our property, educates our children, and builds our roads and bridges. Government arrests and prosecutes criminals among us, and writes laws to regulate fair play in social, cultural, economic and political activities.

But government also can be confusing, threatening and foolish. Examples abound, and here are a few.

The federal government distributes huge sums in grants to programs serving victims of crime and abuse, including the most vulnerable of children. This month, federal officials threatened to withhold those funds from any organization refusing to provide “unrestricted access” to those children and families by immigration enforcement officers.

Yes, of course, what better treatment for a sexually abused child than to provide ICE officials a clear path to detention and deportation of his or her family members?

Whatchamacolumn

Jeb Bladine is president and publisher of the News-Register.

> See his column

Locally, Juliette’s House has launched a major fundraising campaign in anticipation of losing hundreds of thousands of federal dollars. The state of Oregon, on behalf of all victim-service organizations (and others), has responded to the federal government that Oregon will resist and refuse such threats.

American institutions, including state and local governments, have become so dependent on federal grants that they face agonizing decisions in blackmail scenarios that have become everyday politics. It’s a full employment world for the legal and judicial systems that must arbitrate the abuses of power and the rights of citizens, and even non-citizens.

Stepping back to simple confusion, there has been considerable discussion about actual taxpayer cost for the recreation bond going onto McMinnville’s November ballot. Here’s a hypothetical comparison that might help explain the situation.

In 2018, Fred got a five-year car loan from City Bank of McMinnville with monthly payments of $700. In 2021, after getting a raise at work, he decided to buy a new house. Fred’s loan officer said buying the house would cost Fred just $750 more per month than he was already paying for debt. In 2023, after two years of tight budgets, Fred made the final payment on that car loan.

If you haven’t already guessed, Fred’s loan officer handed over the vehicle title along with the news that his monthly payment would be continuing at $1,450 for many years to pay off that house loan.

Those municipal bonding stories can be confusing, so hopefully this helps.

Last up, moving to foolishness, my now-retired friend receives a monthly letter from the Oregon Employment Department repeating the claim that Oregon overpaid him by $414 in Covid pandemic unemployment benefits. It’s a classic “I’m the government and I’m here to help you” message.

Oregon reduced his alleged debt to $180 and declares monthly that repayment is voluntary, but threatens that if he doesn’t pay now, any future unemployment benefit for the 78-year-old will be reduced by $180. One can only wonder how long those monthly missives will continue.

Who knows how many of those messages are efficiently produced and mailed each month? It was Eugene McCarthy who once said, “An efficient bureaucracy is the greatest threat to liberty.”

Jeb Bladine can be reached at jbladine@newsregister.com or 503-687-1223.

Comments

Bigfootlives

Hey Jeb, hope you are doing well. I appreciate your work!

About Fred’s car and house payment. The first thing that pops out is that Fred is not buying another car until that house is paid off. And you failed to mention that the bank is $3 million upside down and expects Fred to be on the hook. Things may be straightened out this year, but the bank’s track record isn’t good. Bad land deals, a $4.5 million balloon payment on the horizon, $21k interest payments that the bank manager shrugs his shoulders at, and the extra money in your example is not for a house for Fred; it's for a pool and a fancy gym that he will likely never use, as he sleeps in his car because he cannot afford to buy a house in town.

We created a system in this country that was set up to fail, and it has failed badly. We are at the end of the beginning of that failure, and it's going to get a lot uglier. The last president’s policy was to overload the system to the point of failure, so that it was unfixable, with some estimates upward of 13-15 million illegal immigrants crossing our borders, and we are seeing the result.

The state of Oregon, Yamhill County, and the city of McMinnville all have sanctuary status. They refuse to transfer custody of criminal illegal aliens to ICE (while the CRIMINAL is in the custody of the local jail, county jail, state prison, etc.) These are criminals that the county or state prioritizes over the rightful citizens of Oregon. They release people charged with or who have served their sentence for assault, trafficking drugs, rape, human trafficking, robbery, murder, and on and on, rather than transferring them to ICE inside the correctional facility. This is a fact. And it's ironic, and horrific, that the example used is a shelter for abused women and children who may be victims of the sanctuary policy. Withholding funds is a tool to force the state's hand, and it has to happen.

Otis

In other words "Gov't can sometimes be good.....but, sometimes, it's bad."



CubFan

Part 1:
Thank you Jeb.

In the car payment scenario, I’ve restated it below in terms of the present and potential future bonds:

“In 2015, Fred got a 15-year car loan from City Bank of McMinnville with monthly payments of $16. In 2025, after getting a raise at work, he decided to buy a new house. Fred’s loan officer said buying the house would cost Fred just $18 more per month than he was already paying for debt. In 2033, after 8 years of tight budgets, Fred made the final payment on that car loan.

If you haven’t already guessed, Fred’s loan officer handed over the vehicle title along with the news that his monthly payment would be continuing at $34 for many years to pay off that house loan.”



Fred was quite relieved to have paid off that car loan, and was eagerly anticipating using the monthly $16 a month to apply it to the other “fees and taxes” he is facing, which may well total $82/mo :
- $15/mo “user fee” on utility bills
- Potential $15/mo stormwater fee
- Potential claw back of $.50/M tax authority from fire department fiasco ($10/mo)
- Governor is strong arming for an additional $42/mo gas tax/registration fee

CubFan

Part 2

The loan officer was quite sly in explaining to Fred the financial impact of the house loan. Yes… “Just $18 a month more” But wise Fred stepped back and looked more of the equation and realized he may not be able to afford that “new house” given his other obligations.

And let’s not forget the rising costs of housing, insurance, utilities, groceries, medical, childcare gas etc. We didn’t even get to the part of Fred’s budget where he has charged a lot of his expenses and now has a huge credit card bill.

Otis

Relax,
Our Marxist prez just Nationalized Intel.


Web Design and Web Development by Buildable