Sal Peralta: Deportations demand strong local response
I have received a great deal of correspondence from residents in recent weeks asking the city to address community concerns about federal immigration enforcement actions in McMinnville and around the nation.
We are entering a time in which immigration enforcement in our community, and our country more broadly, is likely to intensify dramatically.
Based on the funding levels approved by Congress, public statements from federal officials, and documented actions already taken in 2025, it is clear that we are only at the beginning of a national policy aimed at forcibly detaining and removing millions of people from the U.S.
This policy affects U.S. citizens, immigrants with lawful status and undocumented workers alike. Although I am a U.S. citizen with deep family roots in this country, these actions affect me personally and directly impact up to 20 percent of McMinnville residents, including roughly 25 percent of the people living in my ward.
I want our community to understand how unprecedented this moment is: No stable Western democracy in the 20th century has carried out interior policing and detainment on the scale required to physically remove 10 to 20 million people.
Democracies generally do not enforce immigration policy through mass deportation operations against long-settled residents. When we look for historical analogues in North America, the only examples are periods we now recognize as grave violations of civil rights:
-- The forced displacement and reservation resettlement of Native American tribes.
-- The wartime internment of Japanese Americans and Japanese Canadians in the 1940s.
Beyond these episodes, similar large-scale internal policing in the 20th century occurred only within failing democracies or authoritarian regimes such as Vichy France, Apartheid South Africa, Communist China and Nazi Germany. And these are not governing models we should look to for guidance.
When I was sworn in to serve on the city council, I took an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, the Oregon Constitution and the McMinnville City Charter. Based on documented federal actions, I believe constitutional rights are already being harmed for hundreds of thousands if not millions of immigrants in the following ways:
-- Arresting individuals actively pursuing lawful naturalization in the courts.
-- Eliminating lawful immigration pathways mid-process and then deporting those affected.
-- Deporting residents despite judicial orders that they remain.
-- Deporting individuals to third-party nations with which they have no connection.
-- Refusing to complete naturalization for applicants from certain countries.
-- Imposing mandatory detention and denial of bond, resulting in U.S. citizen children confined in jail conditions, often separated from their parents.
-- Attempting to end birthright citizenship.
-- Requiring children, including toddlers, to navigate immigration proceedings without legal representation, or even adult guidance.
Local governments are not responsible for immigration enforcement, and Oregon law prohibits local police from participating in federal immigration actions. But local governments are responsible for public safety and assurance that the constitutional rights of every resident, citizen or noncitizen, are respected.
I have faith that elected leaders at all levels of government will meet this moment. In my view, then, any Oregon city should at a minimum:
-- Require local police to obtain identifying information when an individual is seized by federal immigration agents, so families can be notified, consistent with lawful community-caretaking responsibilities.
-- Document and respond to claims of unlawful use of force by any federal or local agency operating within city limits, both for public safety and to uphold constitutional standards.
These steps do not interfere with federal authority. They simply ensure that cities like McMinnville fulfill their responsibility to protect the rights of people who live here and preserve the constitutional principles we are sworn to uphold.



Comments
Bigfootlives
“…I want our community to understand how unprecedented this moment is: No stable Western democracy in the 20th century has carried out interior policing and detainment on the scale required to physically remove 10 to 20 million people.
Democracies generally do not enforce immigration policy through mass deportation operations against long-settled residents.”
Sal, listen to yourself! No sane western democracies lets 20 million people flood over their border in four years. Every single nation that has, throughout history, in proportion to population has not survived. The proper term is invasion.
A nation without borders will not survive. Just look around.
Mac Runner
The correct term is ethnic cleansing.
HumblyYours
Bigfootlives is right of course. I wish Sal would do more thinking and less regurgitating of things he's heard from sources fraught with error. We wouldn't have to do this at all if the border had been secure. You can lay the blame squarely on the Biden administration and the "Border Czar." To correct that egregious error is not going to always be pretty or easy.
Here's a more realistic look.
Note: LESS THAN ONE PERCENT...
Based on available data as of December 2025, the percentage of ICE arrests and deportations deemed "illegal" (i.e., unlawful under U.S. law, such as detentions of U.S. citizens, legal permanent residents (LPRs) without due process, or warrantless arrests violating constitutional protections) is estimated to be less than 1% of total actions. This figure is derived from documented cases amid approximately 225,000 ICE arrests and 340,000 deportations in fiscal year 2025 (October 2024–September 2025, with most activity post-January under the second Trump administration).
However, this is likely an undercount due to poor government tracking, underreporting, and limited oversight. Advocacy groups like ProPublica and the American Immigration Council report that aggressive tactics, including "collateral arrests" (detaining bystanders without warrants or probable cause), have led to a surge in violations. DHS and ICE maintain that no U.S. citizens are targeted or deported, attributing any incidents to obstruction of officers, but lawsuits and investigations contradict this, showing racial profiling (especially of Latinos) and physical force in sweeps.
Otis
If R's want to run for office by supporting policies like:
eugenics by RFK Jr, ordering our military to commit war crimes, mass grifting and corruption, and a terror campaign of ethnic cleansing by ICE agents, they will continue to lose elections.
It's all very un-American....and the polls show it. Trump is now at 36% approval rate.
Ron
Sal for sure you’re going with the flow. I didn’t see in your comments that Biden and the last administration let in millions and millions of illegals.
If you’re here illegally the law states you need to be deported.
Be careful Otis ICE knows where you live .
Bob
I sure wish Sal was as concerned about the economic problems local taxpayers are facing as he is in national ice and other social issues.
akeesey
This is a chilling but truthful and comprehensive account of what we are undergoing and what is probably coming. We don’t want to believe it because it’s so grotesquely un-American. But Councilor Peralta is laying it out clearly. At the national level, we are governed by people who have elevated their racism over the rule of law. We must stop them,