By Scott Unger • Of the News-Register • 

City plans another rec bond measure

Only current online subscribers may access this article and/or our N-R e-editions.

One-day subscriptions available for just $3.

For all subscription offers, click here.

Already a subscriber, please

Comments

SandyKnoll

I'll still only vote for this if it includes only the rec center with the new pool. Everything else is just regular business and should be in the budget where we are not paying interest on loans.

Dan Tucholsky

Disclaimer: I'm a City Counselor

SandyKnoll this is exactly what I have proposed and we the Council have asked the Interim City Manager to examine and bring back for consideration.

CubFan

Yes, a new pool would be nice... BUT... in today's economy, does it make more sense to spend $25-27 million to update the CURRENT pool instead of spending $40-45 million on a new facility? From a taxpayer perspective- costs/fees keep rising faster than my income. Jessica Payne is correct, the monthly service fee in place continues to be a sticking point for me.

tagup

$13.27….. don’t overlook the “cost of living” for the city.,,

Don Dix

$13.27/month for the majority of MW&L customers - which was to pay off a city mismanagement deficit that has now been paid 2+ times over - and the city is paying $18K/mo.(interest only) for the RB Rubber property - it appears the city's COLA is a little bloated by previous poor decisions.

  • Most viewed
  • Most commented
Web Design and Web Development by Buildable