By Scott Unger • Of the News-Register • 

Board denies Dayton urban renewal district

Only current online subscribers may access this article and/or our N-R e-editions.

One-day subscriptions available for just $3.

For all subscription offers, click here.

Free Trial: In October, the News-Register is offering one-month free digital-only trial subscriptions. Click here to sign up.

Already a subscriber, please

Comments

tagup

That Hampton Lumber tax break looks bigger all the time… reducing county services & stalling economic growth options due to lack of funds. Let’s not forget who made these short sighted decisions come November.

Bouncer

SEEMS LIKE BERSCHAUR HAS A GOOD HANDLE ON THE ISSUES.LETS ALL REMEMBER THAT COME NOVEMBER.AND NOT PAY SO MUCH ATTENTION TO THE GANG.

YamCoCan

Bouncer, did you even watch the meeting and hear her stumble through a gross mischaracterization of tax increment financing? As she claimed URA's never pencil out, despite dozens of successful districts around the area. "Good handle" is absolutely not what she demonstrated. Scared of what she doesn't understand would have been more accurate.

Shasta

Hopefully the citizens of Dayton remember this when Kit is up for re-election. Way to support your local community huh?

oldeee

Willamina has an economic improvement district. Is that the same?

  • Most viewed
  • Most commented
Web Design and Web Development by Buildable