Online subscriber? Please Log In
  

Need Help? | Forgot Your Password?

OMI cuts 15 jobs

Feb 1, 2012 | 7 Comments


By Molly Walker
Of the News-Register


Only online subscribers may access this article. Subscribe online by clicking here. Already a subscriber, please .

Would you like to comment on this article?

Only online subscribers may comment on articles. Click here to see how you can subscribe.
Already a subscriber, please

Note: Some articles do not accept comments at all.

Comments

05:12 pm - Fri, February 3 2012
travelinman16 said:
Unfortunately, this is the new corporate America. It is all about the bottom line and not the dedicated employees that have been loyal and built the company and watched it grow to what it is today. This is not just about OMI but other companies as well, such as A-dec who did this terrible same thing several years ago. Gone is the dedication of the employer to the long term employee who possesses the most knowledge of the operation of a company and chooses the lesser paid, less knowledgeable employee who helped them get where they are today. Shame on you corporate America.....
08:14 am - Sun, February 5 2012
Don Dix said:
I happen to know some of those 'laid off'. Years of loyal service, and it ends with a pink slip. It wouldn't be a surprise if OMI has repeatedly implored employees to be loyal to the company, team effort, and all -- the usual rah-rah treatment. Then drop a hammer on some who are nearing retirement.

And most likely, those let go unwittingly trained their replacements, who receive a reduced salary (seniority pays better). Another blatant slap!

The article states, �We let people go that had a decade or two with us�. That would be a 'watered down' observation -- some of these folks have been there more than 3 decades. In this instance, company loyalty seems to be a one-sided affair. Sorry OMI, but if negative press and public scorn are forthcoming, it is all well deserved!
02:37 pm - Mon, February 6 2012
Manup said:
I just heard of another McMinnville business that "let go" an employee who had punched away 16 years working from the very, very bottom on up to plant manager. 16 years of working hard, very few sick days and was always reluctant to take a vaca day. Dedication was his middle name, yet instead of offering retirement to the one above him who would get it eventually anyways as he has been there 25+ years, they fire the one who could become eligible for retirement soon, thus washing their hands of that unnecessary cost, and brought in a nobody to fill his shoes.
It seems many businesses are saying *-you to their long standing employees in an effort to cut costs- what happened to putting in your time and retiring from a decent company? Those days seem to be long gone. Shameful.
12:18 pm - Tue, February 7 2012
Michael Tubbs Sr said:
This story got me to thinking about the Japanese salary-men, factory workers and those 'Job for Life' promises that had been implied/made to them back in the late 70's early 80's.

I could be wrong, but I highly doubt any corporation based here in America has ever promised that to any employee. If you can think of one, please name it. Even the United States Navy is downsizing and laying-off some very dedicated sailors that had fully intended/expected to serve-out their own careers to the point of retirement.
06:29 pm - Tue, February 7 2012
juskickinit said:
.....Unfortunately, this is the new corporate America. It is all about the bottom line .......

Sorry travelinman16 but the bottom line is not the new corporate America. It has always been what drives business. You do not get to get paid anything if the profit is not much.

......what happened to putting in your time and retiring from a decent company? ..............

Manup was there ever really a time when your statement (above) was true?

Many reasons I was always self employed and loyalty from a company was one. There was never any such thing.
02:00 pm - Thu, February 9 2012
ItIsWhatItIs said:
myneighbor worked for a nursery in yamhill for over 20 years, he says they have laid off a whole bunch of people who had worked for them anywhere from 8 - 25 years, but they kept a lot of the newer people...makes you wonder if they just want to clean house and get rid of the older folk who probably earn more money
08:09 am - Mon, February 13 2012
Manup said:
Sounds like the death of a raise. If you put in time, get your raises due to good work performance, being on time, etc. eventually it will come back and bite you in the... bum. Better to turn down the raise you deserve and hope that your low entry level wage keeps you employed. Shameful.
© 1999- News-Register Publishing | © The Associated Press
The News-Register and NewsRegister.com are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Web design & powered by LVSYS