Armed group in Oregon fears raid; critics decry goals

Of the Associated Press

BURNS — The small, armed group occupying a remote national wildlife preserve in Oregon has said repeatedly that local people should control federal lands — a sentiment that frustrates critics who say the lands are already managed to help everyone from ranchers to recreationalists.

With the takeover entering its fourth day Wednesday, authorities had not removed the group of roughly 20 people from the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in eastern Oregon's high desert country. But members of the group — some from as far away as Arizona and Michigan — were growing increasingly tense, saying they feared a federal raid.

Arizona rancher LaVoy Finicum said Tuesday evening that he believes federal officials have issued warrants for the arrest of five group members — including himself and Ammon Bundy — but Finicum offered no details.

The FBI in Portland referred calls to the Harney County Joint Information Center, which said in a statement it had no information on arrests or arrest warrants and that authorities were “still working on a peaceful resolution.”

Bundy said they would take a defensive position anticipating a possible raid. Late Tuesday, the group moved a large plow vehicle to block the refuge's driveway.

Bundy told reporters Tuesday the group would leave when there was a plan in place to turn over federal lands to locals — a common refrain in a decades-long fight over public lands in the West.

“It is our goal to get the logger back to logging, the rancher back to ranching,” said the son of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, who was involved in a high-profile 2014 standoff with the government over grazing rights.

The younger Bundy's anti-government group is critical of federal land stewardship. But environmentalists and others say U.S. officials should keep control for the broadest possible benefit to business, recreation and the environment.

Randy Eardley, a Bureau of Land Management spokesman, said the group's call for land ownership transfer didn't make sense.

“It is frustrating when I hear the demand that we return the land to the people, because it is in the people's hand — the people own it,” Eardley said. “Everybody in the United States owns that land. ... We manage it the best we can for its owners, the people, and whether it's for recreating, for grazing, for energy and mineral development.”

Bob Sallinger, conservation director of the Audubon Society of Portland, said in a statement this week that occupation of the refuge “holds hostage public lands and public resources to serve the very narrow political agenda of the occupiers.”

The armed group seized the refuge's headquarters Saturday night. Bundled in camouflage, earmuffs and cowboy hats, they seem to be centered around a complex of buildings on the 300-square-mile high desert preserve.

Finicum said the power was still on at buildings at the refuge. “If they cut it off, that would be such a crying shame. All the pipes would freeze,” he said.

Ammon Bundy offered few specifics about the group's plan to get the land turned over to local control, but Finicum said they would examine the underlying land ownership transactions to begin to “unwind it.”

The federal government controls about half of all land in the West, which would make the wholesale transfer of ownership extremely difficult and expensive.

For example, it owns 53 percent of Oregon, 85 percent of Nevada and 66 percent of Utah, according to the Congressional Research Service. Taking over federal public lands in Idaho could cost the state $111 million a year, according to a University of Idaho study.

Bundy said the group felt it had the support of the local community. But the county sheriff has told the group to go home, and many locals don't want them around, fearing they may bring trouble. A community meeting was scheduled for Wednesday. Harney County Sheriff David Ward said in a statement the meeting was to “talk about their security concerns and the disruptions that the behavior of the militants on the refuge are causing for our people.”

So far, law enforcement hasn't taken action against the group, whose rallying cry is the imprisonment of father-and-son ranchers who set fire to federal land.

The group calling itself Citizens for Constitutional Freedom said it wants an inquiry into whether the government is forcing ranchers off their land after Dwight Hammond and his son, Steven, reported back to prison Monday.

The Hammonds, who have distanced themselves from the group, were convicted of arson three years ago and served no more than a year. A judge later ruled the terms fell short of minimum sentences that require them to serve about four more years.

The takeover comes amid a dispute that dates back decades in the West. In the 1970s, Nevada and other states pushed for local control in what was known as the Sagebrush Rebellion. Supporters wanted more land for cattle grazing, mining and timber harvesting.


Associated Press writer Gene Johnson in Seattle contributed to this story.



The gunman holding the federal facility hostage are nothing more than a bunch of selfish entitled brats throwing a tantrum over the fact that they can't have everything they want. Its ironic that they say they want the land returned to the people. Don't they know that the people already OWN the land? In fact, we the taxpayer have been footing the bill for the Bundys to take their cattle to market every year and pocket the profits. The federal grazing program is a huge money loser for the taxpayer. Add the wild horse and burro program and you have millions of dollars transferred from every person who pays taxes to the pockets of the rancher. To add insult to injury a few of the ranchers think the taxpayer subsidies they get are not enough and refuse to pay the pittance required by the feds to compensate the taxpayer for the thousands of miles of water line we run to remote areas to water the rancher's cattle. We pay for weed management, range restoration, habitat improvement, and more. In 2014 the taxpayer allocated 79.9 million dollars for the grazing program and the BLM collected 12.1 million dollars in grazing fees. The wild horse and burro program costs the taxpayer another 77 million dollars. Collectively we pay to support a wide variety of uses (including grazing) of the people's land and it is insulting when these radicals feel entitled more free stuff and demand that all of the land be used for their needs and their's alone. Maybe we should end the grazing program, leave the wild horses and burros to live free and save ourselves some money. Let's see how much the ranchers like it when they have to pay the actual going rate for grazing....a rate about 4 or more times what they currently pay.


The Bundy Boys and their associates really come off as fools. They tell us they are prepared to occupy the refuge for months or years, Oh! By the way could you supporters send snacks and warm socks. If you want an even more interesting account of what's going on down there, check out the erotic fan fiction going on about it, it's a great laugh! The thing I cant laugh about is the idea these clowns will most likely get to keep their guns and go home. If they were anything but spoiled little rich, white, good old boys the would be shut down pretty quickly and spend the next years of their pathetic excuses for lives in prison. The worst of all is they are not from here, and they are following a message from their god,to have an armed stand off. Somebody save us from this stupidity!


For some fun reading, google "Brokeback Bird Sanctuary", it's a great alternative look at what's really going on down there.

Web Design & Web Development by LVSYS