• 

Investigating the Bible: New insight, new behavior

By DAVID CARLSON PASTOR

The late Stephen Covey, in “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People,” described his experience on a New York subway when a man and his young children boarded. The children began to run around, being loud and rude to all the passengers.

Covey, irritated that the father did nothing to stop their wildness, said: “Sir, your children are really disturbing a lot of people. I wonder if you couldn’t control them a little more?” The man replied, “I guess I should do something about it. We just came from the hospital where their mother died about an hour ago.” Covey’s attitude immediately changed and he offered to help the man. In the Bible are many stories where new insight leads to radical changes in behavior.

Blindness in Jesus’ world was considered God’s judgment for past sin. The blind were branded as sinners and could be forced to beg if they had no family to help. Even today, when people through no obvious fault of their own suffer illness or losses, some may quietly think this is karma. As Jesus and his disciples walked by a man blind from birth, they asked: “‘Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?’ Jesus answered, ‘It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him.” (John 9:2-3, English Standard Version used throughout.)

Jesus affirmed that both the parents and the blind man had sinned. However he offered a different purpose for the man’s suffering: To be a living billboard for God. Soon after, Jesus used miraculous power to give the blind man sight. Since Jesus had healed him on the Sabbath, the Pharisees coldly said this was sin. When the newly sighted man defended the actions of Jesus, saying “If this man were not from God, he could do nothing’ (John 9:33), the Pharisees promptly threw him out of their synagogue.

Some changes in perspective take time. Job was a wealthy patriarch in days long before the birth of Jesus. God permitted Satan to destroy his perfect life, taking all his wealth, killing all his children, and even torturing his body with painful sores. Over several weeks Job is counseled and reprimanded by unhelpful friends. Job defended his resentment toward God and asked to die. God then spoke directly to him and finally Job understood: “I know that you can do all things, and that no purpose of yours can be thwarted … I have heard you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes.” (Job 42:2, 5-6).

Some shifts in our beliefs happen when we look at others. Dr. David Jeremiah wrote about Jimmy Durante, a popular comedian from 1920 through the 1970s. His self-deprecating humor focused on his oversized nose, which he called his great schnozzola.

During World War II, he entertained troops and was invited at the last minute by a military leader to perform for another large group. Durante was running late. “Okay,” he said. “But I can only stay a few minutes.” He told some jokes; however, after the few minutes passed, he didn’t stop. He stayed over 30 minutes, to the delight of the men. The leader asked him why he stayed. Durante explained, “As I started my set, I looked down at the front row of soldiers. Two men were sitting side by side. One had lost his left arm and the other his right. They laughed and clapped throughout by each using his one arm with the other. When I saw that, I couldn’t leave!” The suffering of Jesus is inspiration for believers: “Consider him who endured from sinners such hostility against himself, so that you may not grow weary or fainthearted. In your struggle against sin you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood.” (Hebrews 12:3-4).

David Carlson Pastor (yes, that is his last name, not his profession) is a Polk County resident and graduate of Bethel Theological Seminary in Minnesota (M.Div., M.Th.)

Comments

fiddler

Myth, part 1

Who doesn’t like a superhero like Batman or Superman? Apparently early Christians liked a good superhero, too. Early Christians were familiar with Greek and Roman myths and their superheroes.

Knowing this, to make Christianity a ‘thing’, the writers of the NT fashioned their tales after the Greek and Roman myths to promote the popularity of Christianity. The mythical superhero called Jesus caught on and is still going strong 1800+ years later.

Modern mythicists and theologians compare the NT Christian superhero with Greek and Roman myths. For instance, D.M. Murdoch wrote about sun gods and Jesus: their virgin births on the 25th of December, being crucified or murdered, going underground or in a tomb, rising on the third day, preaching in temples at age twelve, and so on.

D.R. MacDonald, a professor of theology, compares the content of the NT to Greek and Roman myths, such as the Odyssey and the Illiad. Let’s look at an example from his writings.

Because this is the season Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus on 25 December each year, let’s take a look at MacDonald’s comparison between the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite and Luke 1:26-38 and 2:8-15.

[All this is important because if we're mere puppets of NT-Greek-Roman myths, then we will likely miss it when someone becomes a dictator (maybe in the US in the next 1-4 years) and he tells us what we need to know, what books to read, what to believe, and so on, and limits access to anything that disagrees with his dictates (under the penalty of death and imprisonment--name the dictator here that has done this). We must question everything, even the NT.]

fiddler

Myth, part 2

Homer: Anchises was among the steep slopes of many-fountained Ida/caring for his cattle./…All the others were following the cattle at the grassy meadows.
Luke: Mary was alone in her bedroom. There were shepherds lodging in that region keeping watch at night over their flock.

Homer: Aphrodite, Zeus’s daughter, stood before him.
Luke: The angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city in Galilee. An angel of the Lord stood before them.

Homer: When he saw Aphrodite’s neck and beautiful eyes,/he was terrified and looked away.
Luke: At this word Mary was terrified and considered what this greeting might mean. The shepherds were greatly afraid.

Homer: Anchises, most glorious of mortal men,/take courage and do not fear greatly in your heart./You should not fear suffering evil from me/or from the other blessed ones, for you are loved by the gods.
Luke: Mary, do not fear, for you have found favor with God. Do not be afraid for behold I announce to you great joy that will be for all the people.

Homer: You will have a dear son.
Luke: Mary will become pregnant and birth a son. Today, in the city of David, a savior is born to you.

fiddler

Myth, part 3

To ferret out our superhero Jesus from other antecedent superheroes, MacDonald uses common criteria when comparing the NT to ancient myths, as follows:

>accessibility – the likelihood that the author of the NT book had access to the putative model;

>analogy – the popularity of the target-did other authors imitate the same proposed literary model;

>density – the more parallels posited between two texts the stronger the case they issue from a literary connection;

>order – the sequencing of similarities in the two works;

>distinctive trait – anything unusual in both the ‘targeted model’ and the ‘proposed borrower’ that links the two into a special relationship;

>interpretability – what, if anything, may be gained by viewing one text as a debtor to another, usually ancient authors emulated their antecedents to rival them, in style, philosophical adequacy, persuasiveness, or religious perspective.

But The Gospels and Homer, and Luke and Vergil, employ yet another that pertains primarily to Gospel narratives:

>“Often Greek readers prior to 1000 C.E. were aware of affinities between New Testament narratives and their putative classical Greek models. Such ancient and Byzantine recognitions often suggest imitations in the original composition of the Gospels.”

fiddler

Myth, part 4

"The indebtedness of Mark and Luke to the Homeric epics does not call into question Jesus' existence; the Evangelists (Xtians who wrote the Gospels) simply injected him with narrative steroids to let him compete with the mythological heroes of Greeks and Romans....This rivalry became an embarrassment and remains so for many modern Christians, who insist that the Evangelists (writers of the Gospels) inherited their information from reliable eyewitnesses....[O]ne should evaluate Gospel stories not as naive attempts to record a historical biography but as sophisticated attempts to create a rival to Greek and Roman superheroes. Their value lies not in their historical reliability but in their mythological and ethical power, in their ability to compel readers to life-changing decisions to follow Jesus."

fiddler

Myth, part 4

"The indebtedness of Mark and Luke to the Homeric epics does not call into question Jesus' existence; the Evangelists (Xtians who wrote the Gospels) simply injected him with narrative steroids to let him compete with the mythological heroes of Greeks and Romans....This rivalry became an embarrassment and remains so for many modern Christians, who insist that the Evangelists (writers of the Gospels) inherited their information from reliable eyewitnesses....[O]ne should evaluate Gospel stories not as naive attempts to record a historical biography but as sophisticated attempts to create a rival to Greek and Roman superheroes. Their value lies not in their historical reliability but in their mythological and ethical power, in their ability to compel readers to life-changing decisions to follow Jesus."

Otis

Unfortunately, maga believes that their Jesus should be like "Homelander".

Lulu

What exactly is your point?

Otis

Point is that a book meant to inspire faith and good works in people has now been hijacked by politicians. They want to force a theocracy upon us using brutality and intimidation....at the end of a gun barrel. Which goes against everything in that book.

Lulu

It remains just a book, not a gospel.

CubFan

Lulu, you’re absolutely correct, it is a book. But not just any book, it happens to be the best selling book of all time. And a book translated into more languages than any other. For good reason. It is the divinely inspired, infallible word of God, a love letter to all mankind, which details God’s original plan for man, how that plan was corrupted by satan, and how God provided restoration for man through His Son, Jesus Christ. It IS the “gospel”, which in translated from the Old English translation of the Hellenistic Greek term meaning “good news”. Jesus Christ died to save me from eternal; damnation, He is my Savior, and that, most certainly, IS GOOD NEWS !

There are many who don’t believe this. I pray the eyes of your heart are opened so you can see this for yourself.

Lulu

Maybe you could arrange for another Inquisition to force open the eyes of the skeptics through torture.

yamhillbilly2

The bible is not a dictation of ‘the word of god’! It is a collection of stories that a few priests etc. selected to bunch together and refer to it as the bible. Why do so many different bibles exist for the different religions? The bible contains numerous stories many people find to be pornography and pure myth. By the way, do not pray to your god to help me see things your sickly twisted way. My view is much clearer than yours.

Lulu

Psalm 137 (KJV): "O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed,...happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones."
Leviticus 24:16 (KJV): "And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him..."

You call this the good news? Count me out. Keep your eyes on your own paper.

Lulu

Just for the record: my heart contains no eyes.

Web Design and Web Development by Buildable