Online subscriber? Please Log In

Need Help? | Forgot Your Password?

Signs sprout as spring election nears

Apr 14, 2014 | 7 Comments

By Don Iler
Of the News-Register

Only online subscribers may access this article. Subscribe online by clicking here. Already a subscriber, please .

Would you like to comment on this article?

Only online subscribers may comment on articles. Click here to see how you can subscribe.
Already a subscriber, please

Note: Some articles do not accept comments at all.


09:25 pm - Wed, April 16 2014
scanner said:
If this is the case in Yamhill County, why are there so many Mary Starrett signs that are clearly in the right-of-way?
09:29 pm - Wed, April 16 2014
paperclip said: would think a candidate for County Commissioner would know the law and obey it.
11:23 pm - Wed, April 16 2014
Looey said:
Maybe it's a bogus law that infringes on the property owner's freedom to express their political views...and maybe the cities, county, and ODOT don't care to fight a battle they'd likely lose.
06:00 am - Thu, April 17 2014
sunrise said:
Whoa Looey, are you saying that if a candidate (in this case Mary Starrett) decides that a law is bogus then they simply don't have to obey it? She might want to think ahead about the oath of office she would be taking whereby she swears to uphold the law as an elected official. A property owner does have a right to express their views on their property, not in the right-of-way.
08:31 am - Thu, April 17 2014
kona said:
Interesting ...... "scanner" and "paperclip" set up a straw-man setting and then "sunrise" puts the dagger in. Aren't politics exciting !!!
09:51 am - Thu, April 17 2014
Spongebob said:
For most campaigners, signs on public property aren't a matter of deliberately flouting the law; but more likely the result of over-zealous volunteers who are unclear of where the lines are. The boundaries of public rights-of-way are not always easy to determine. You might be surprised to find out how far into your own yard the public right-of-way extends. Looey is just plain wrong; these battles have been waged and decided many times. Fortunately, most public jurisdictions handle minor violations with reasonable tact; usually a phone call. But, as kona suggests, campaigns do get people excited.
12:35 am - Sat, April 19 2014
treefarmer said:
“…..campaigns do get people excited.”

You make a great point, Spongebob. We can be sure that the candidates aren’t out there planting all those signs themselves. Still, the rules for locating signs ought to be obeyed and it does not reflect well on the candidate when boundaries are blatantly overstepped. I consider those huge improperly-placed signs to be offensive (sometimes dangerous) and while that is certainly not a major criteria that influences my vote, it is something to consider. It feels like the candidate needs to shout at us to compensate for his/her lack of actual substance. Further, (in this voter’s opinion) the huge “loud” signs tend to reflect poorly on the smaller ones that are planted around them as well. Guilt by association.

© 1999- News-Register Publishing | © The Associated Press
The News-Register and are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Web design & powered by LVSYS