Online subscriber? Please Log In
  

Need Help? | Forgot Your Password?

Ore. task force looks for alternatives to fuel tax

Jun 10, 2012 | 6 Comments


By The Associated Press

Only online subscribers may access this article. Subscribe online by clicking here. Already a subscriber, please .

Would you like to comment on this article?

Only online subscribers may comment on articles. Click here to see how you can subscribe.
Already a subscriber, please

Note: Some articles do not accept comments at all.

Comments

11:00 am - Mon, June 11 2012
miketubbs1 said:
Stop pioneering new stretches of highways and road until we can properly maintain what's already in use.
05:45 pm - Mon, June 11 2012
Mack said:
Dear Oregon State Government, Here is a novel idea: Instead of brainstorming up these draconian ways to suck more taxes out of us how about spending your energy and time figuring out ways to STOP SPENDING SO MUCH.
11:23 am - Tue, June 12 2012
miketubbs1 said:
"....so drivers can avoid charges for driving out of state...."

How about all those out of state vehicles being driving in state, the truckers and especially the tourists? Will they be exempted from paying any possible 'wear & tear' tax based on mileage?

If so, why?

Just curious, what are the ODOT numbers on estimated miles being driven by out of state drivers (of all sorts) throughout Oregon?
01:00 am - Wed, June 13 2012
miketubbs1 said:
"The pilot program is part of a bigger plan by a state task force looking for alternatives... ."

An alternative to how citations issued for speeding may evolve through data cleaned from such a device. Reference points might be used to gauge the travel speed of vehicles through certain corridors. Another alternative may help to keep track of who's vehicle is traveling to and from various points of interest to law enforcement agencies.

Would the state be allowed to sell any of the information gleaned from such data to non-governmental parties, such as casino's perhaps, so as to aid them in targeting advertising?
01:42 pm - Wed, June 13 2012
Don Dix said:
On the one hand, the state has enthusiastically encouraged citizens to conserve energy, including gas -- go electric, or at least drive higher mileage vehicles. It should be fairly obvious that type of encouragement could result in less bulk sales of gas -- except to the Einstein's in our legislature, and ODOT who promoted and testified to raising the tax.

On the other hand, during the vetting process, these two 'thinktanks' made all sorts of promises of repairs and new construction all over the state, including the Dunberg Bypass, if they could just raise that gas tax. But just 17 months later, it just won't be enough, partially because some people took the advice (of the one hand) to conserve, so gas sales are down. Really? That's the argument to implement 'another tax'? How does Oregon end up with such a bunch of boobs?

Quite frankly, none of these nimrods should be allowed out without proper supervision -- and decidedly not in charge of Oregon's future!



06:45 am - Mon, June 18 2012
ronpaul2012 said:
Our spending comes from the privatized federal reserve, every dollar loaned to the US by the federal reserve is owed back. If you ever allow the issuance of currency to be controlled by a private central bank, we will wake up on the land our fathers conquered homeless, and hungry.

© 1999- News-Register Publishing | © The Associated Press
The News-Register and NewsRegister.com are owned and operated by News-Register Publishing Co., P.O. Box 727, McMinnville, OR 97128.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Web design & powered by LVSYS